Quantcast
Channel: autospinstaller Issue Tracker Rss Feed
Browsing all 1245 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Created Unassigned: dotNetFX4.5 "missing" [22100]

Before first use of AutoSPInstaller 3.99.51 the host (Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard) had all recent dotNet versions installed, including NDP46-KB3045557-x86-x64-AllOS-ENU.exe which 'upgrades' dotNet...

View Article


Created Unassigned: Error: Custom file location is not accessible [22112]

've downloaded the latest version of AutoSPInstaller 3.99.51. I've made a new .xml file for the Beta2 SP2016 SharePoint version. When I start the installation, when the script tries to install the...

View Article


Created Unassigned: Minor: userExists function [22114]

Hi,The userExists function takes only the user name and checks it against the current domain. that's fine but if I have a test\joe in the xml file and my doman is called whatever.com I still see in the...

View Article

Created Unassigned: The tool was unable to install Application Server Role,...

Solution:On a clean install of Windows 2012...

View Article

Commented Unassigned: The tool was unable to install Application Server Role,...

Solution:On a clean install of Windows 2012...

View Article


Commented Unassigned: The tool was unable to install Application Server Role,...

Solution:On a clean install of Windows 2012...

View Article

Commented Unassigned: The tool was unable to install Application Server Role,...

Solution:On a clean install of Windows 2012...

View Article

Created Unassigned: 2012 Vs 2012 R2 : .net 3.5 install SXS Folder choice [22116]

I'm testing the install on both 2012 server and 2012 R2 (both RTM) and I couldn't install .net 3.5 without giving the installer two separate sxs folder based on server version. I added a folder...

View Article


Commented Unassigned: 2012 Vs 2012 R2 : .net 3.5 install SXS Folder choice...

I'm testing the install on both 2012 server and 2012 R2 (both RTM) and I couldn't install .net 3.5 without giving the installer two separate sxs folder based on server version. I added a folder...

View Article


Commented Unassigned: 2012 Vs 2012 R2 : .net 3.5 install SXS Folder choice...

I'm testing the install on both 2012 server and 2012 R2 (both RTM) and I couldn't install .net 3.5 without giving the installer two separate sxs folder based on server version. I added a folder...

View Article

Commented Unassigned: 2012 Vs 2012 R2 : .net 3.5 install SXS Folder choice...

I'm testing the install on both 2012 server and 2012 R2 (both RTM) and I couldn't install .net 3.5 without giving the installer two separate sxs folder based on server version. I added a folder...

View Article

Created Unassigned: install SharePoint2016 beta2 [22123]

hello in SP\AutoSPInstaller\AutoSPInstallerMain.ps1BUG in string line from 242 to 251 if ($env:spVer -ge "15") # These are for SP2013+ only { CreateAppManagementServiceApp $xmlinput...

View Article

Created Unassigned: Error during "Installing Features" [22126]

Hi,I'm unable to install SP2016 beta 2. I'm getting this errors during "Installing Features":``` - Installing Features...WARNING: Feature PointPublishing\Feature.xml had failed to install for the...

View Article


Commented Unassigned: Error during "Installing Features" [22126]

Hi,I'm unable to install SP2016 beta 2. I'm getting these errors during "Installing Features":``` - Installing Features...WARNING: Feature PointPublishing\Feature.xml had failed to install for the...

View Article

Commented Unassigned: Error during "Installing Features" [22126]

Hi,I'm unable to install SP2016 beta 2. I'm getting these errors during "Installing Features":``` - Installing Features...WARNING: Feature PointPublishing\Feature.xml had failed to install for the...

View Article


Commented Unassigned: Error during "Installing Features" [22126]

Hi,I'm unable to install SP2016 beta 2. I'm getting these errors during "Installing Features":``` - Installing Features...WARNING: Feature PointPublishing\Feature.xml had failed to install for the...

View Article

Created Unassigned: Win32_Products to be avoided ! [22135]

the Get-SharePointInstall function takes a long time to process because it is using the wim (or cim) win32_products class. According to mister google this class should be avoided.Explanation here:...

View Article


Commented Unassigned: Win32_Products to be avoided ! [22135]

the Get-SharePointInstall function takes a long time to process because it is using the wim (or cim) win32_products class. According to mister google this class should be avoided.Explanation here:...

View Article

Edited Issue: Win32_Products to be avoided ! [22135]

the Get-SharePointInstall function takes a long time to process because it is using the wim (or cim) win32_products class. According to mister google this class should be avoided.Explanation here:...

View Article

Commented Issue: Win32_Products to be avoided ! [22135]

the Get-SharePointInstall function takes a long time to process because it is using the wim (or cim) win32_products class. According to mister google this class should be avoided.Explanation here:...

View Article
Browsing all 1245 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>